RolStoppable said:
There was no good reason to doubt this conclusion in the first place. If the WSJ had lied about this letter, the whole outlet would have suffered severe consequences. There was so much at stake that it had to be the truth. Trump has a history of bragging about sleeping with women, so when his note to Epstein mentions a wonderful secret, it's clearly not refering to adult women. The text implicates that they share the same preference and that they are on the same page when it comes to that specific topic. Mike Johnson vigorously defended Trump after the description of the letter was published. Protecting paedophiles is the typical behavior of a Christian in a leadership position. |
Oh I didn't doubt the letter, I was confident it was real, and yeah the text at the time was really fucking suspicious but I feel like WSJ didn't make it clear just how fucked up the actual drawing is, the drawing is new, and the drawing makes it beyond doubt for me that this whole letter is pedo-coded and Trump is the pedo, not that he is protecting pedos but he is one. That drawing is just fucking ugh.
Last edited by Ryuu96 - on 09 September 2025






