By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
sc94597 said:
Chrkeller said:

TBH, I am in board meetings for work.  I can assure you they are getting their money one way or another.  Hell it could involve having 5 people do the work of 10 and reducing operating costs.  Ain't no board taking a huge hit on their money, it will 100% be passed on, full stop.  

Going robotics, using AI, outsourcing, etc, etc.  The board is getting their money.  

If there are opportunities for reducing costs without affecting revenue and further maximizing profits, why aren't they already pursuing them independent of a prospective tax change? 

At the margins the incentive is the same whether there is a tax increase or not. 

If a company has 5% YoY growth and potentially can reduce costs to get 7% YoY growth they're going to aim to do that just the same as if they get 2% YoY growth and want 4%. 

They have and are.  A major company will replace workers the second they can.  A tax increase will accelerate their plans.  

Bringing MFG back will raise the costs of good, but IMO, is the answer.  More jobs = more competition = higher salaries = better lifestyle

Which is why I really hope the $1,000,000,000,000 planned investments by Apple, Nvidia, etc come to reality.  The best fix for our system is more jobs in the US. 

This is also why I am not anti tariffs, but on the fence.  Time will tell if jobs come back.  

And before somebody does the whole "false promises" crap (not directed you, you are good guy) that is nonsense.  False investment promises of publicly traded companies is a security and exchange commission violation, a fricking massive one.  



i7-13700k

Vengeance 32 gb

RTX 4090 Ventus 3x E OC

Switch OLED