sc94597 said:
Okay but your disagreement then is with equality opportunity as well as equality of outcome. If different people have different resources available to them at birth, and no capacity to bridge that gap unless they make even more exceptional decisions given the constraints they inherited, then there really isn't equality of opportunity. There is just mere equality before the law. The compromise in modern society for enabling inheritance has been to give alternative paths for people born in situations with fewer opportunities. This is what every modern successful society has done, including the United States. The social darwinist approach of the late 19th century of let people use whichever lemons they were dealt hindered productivity and general wealth accumulation, rather than enabling it. By the way, I don't have children, won't have childen, and plan to give all of my wealth away when I die. I still (voluntarily, not because I have to to survive) work 60 hours per week. The right-libertarian conception of time-preference while broadly true as a general perspective isn't precise enough, imo. |
Yes, that is what I believe.
|
i7-13700k |
|
Vengeance 32 gb |
|
RTX 4090 Ventus 3x E OC |
Switch OLED







