If your initial objective was to talk good about Nintendo I don't get why shift it to this lol. Instead of making Nintendo looking good by their own merits it makes it look like they need help from the other companies struggling to show real value.
PS right now it's in a state where there isn't a clear path but that far from being "the worst chapter" (because they are making money, more than ever) it only shows they are in a state of rebuilding like many other companies have before. People love to talk about how good Capcom is doing and yes they are doing great and it's deserved but they don't remember or don't want to remember the SFV era, the MVCI era, the Resident Evi 6 era, the DMC4/DMC reboot era, the Umbrella Corps era, the Lost Planet 3 era, etc. All of that helped to take the company to where they are now. Why PS doesn't deserve the opportunity of failing and rectifying without people killing them in their minds? LOL.
Now you talk about people happily buying what Nintendo has to offer but is that really a 100% good thing? Pokémon is the perfect example it's not. I'm not going to talk about the games being fun or not because contrary to what many "people" think that depends of who plays the games not on your favorite personality opinion but Pokémon has been bad software for a decade and people buy it like crazy. I can tell you that level of effort wouldn't sell on PS and that's a good thing because that very reason basically killed the service push and no I don't have anything against services but the intention of shifting completely was clear and that is/was a problem.
Existing User Log In
New User Registration
Register for a free account to gain full access to the VGChartz Network and join our thriving community.
