So is it the tool that is the problem or is it the user using the tool. If I write a program and its buggy as well but I used Visual Studio, is visual studio the problem or would it be me. The reason I ask this question is because lately I have been using a lot of AI tools out their especially the coding ones. What I have found is that you get out of the tool the best if you know what you are doing. This ideal that AI tools is this magic box where I give it some detailed commands and it pump out perfect results is of course fiction.
The statement about the graphic job in Linkedin is a perfect example. Is it the AI tool the issue or the person who used the tool, did not get a perfect result and then did nothing to fix the issue which if you have any simple ability could have been done with just MS paint.
I can assure you that AI tools today can get you about 95% of the way and usually the rest has to be done by someone experienced. I will also tell you that you can accomplish a job that would usually have taken a team of developers to do a few years that now you can do within days. Its easy to say "MS, how dare you use this tool, its going to kill jobs but the reality is, if you are not using the tool than you are missing out on a huge portion of productivity. If one developer can now do and create what it took a team to do, I am not sure what you do about that as a company. I even wonder if the company I work for will retool their whole enterprise front end using AI tools and then bolt on the backend with a few devs.
While we are concentrating on MS, I believe this is going to be a real big industry problem way quicker than anyone is prepared for. You can believe a lot of CEO/CTOs are contemplating these very decisions now. I already seen a previous company I use to work for get rid of a lot of developers and now pushing AI solutions as their biggest products.
