Mummelmann said:
pokoko said:
Here's the thing that marks you for who you are.
You came into a discussion about an article that described how a 12 year old child was shamed and mistreated in front of her peers and your first instinct was to support and excuse the inappropriate behavior of those responsible.
The debate about her dress doesn't even matter that much, the way the situation was handled is the worst part, but you didn't give a damn about that, not as long as you could climb up on your political soap box.
Then you followed that up with an infantile attack on the sexuality of anyone who disagreed with you.ÂÂ
Bravo. You've shown yourself for who you are and it's not a good look.
|
You know, if someone comes in here and don't explicitly state that they're against the humiliation and disenfranchisement of young girls, that makes them a misogynist and staunch supporter of the patriarchy. It's also probable that such an individual will be afraid of sexuality and will be an asexual. I mean, it only makes sense.
|
Sure, if said person ignored a bunch of mysogonistic remarks and only took umbrage at the one person who pointed out the actual real rule infringement the decision was based on rather than blaming Muslims, foreigners, crazy left wingers and other imagined threats.
