pokoko said:
SeaDaVie said:
Here’s the thing that marks you for who you are. You came into this discussion and took objection to what I had to say, and zero objection to any of the many anti-Muslim statements made. You’re shown yourself for who you are. Referring to the UK as a Muslim country is not a wild take but challenging the cultural significance of a spice girl outfit and a cheap plastic carnival hat is a wild take. |
Here's the thing that marks you for who you are.
You came into a discussion about an article that described how a 12 year old child was shamed and mistreated in front of her peers and your first instinct was to support and excuse the inappropriate behavior of those responsible. The debate about her dress doesn't even matter that much, the way the situation was handled is the worst part, but you didn't give a damn about that, not as long as you could climb up on your political soap box.
Then you followed that up with an infantile attack on the sexuality of anyone who disagreed with you.Â
Bravo. You've shown yourself for who you are and it's not a good look. |
You know, if someone comes in here and don't explicitly state that they're against the humiliation and disenfranchisement of young girls, that makes them a misogynist and staunch supporter of the patriarchy. It's also probable that such an individual will be afraid of sexuality and will be an asexual. I mean, it only makes sense.
