| the-pi-guy said: It's more just me overthinking. I have basically all the mainline games (except for XIII and the multiplayer ones), and I intend to play all of them.  I was playing through Final Fantasy III and life got busy. And I don't really like coming into a game partway, so I'm not sure if I want to restart III but I also kind of feel like a change of pace might be good too. Kind of in the mood to replay X, kind of want to start playing XII, also kind of feel like I should keep up on III. Too many good options. |
If its any of the Pixel Remasters, shouldnt take too long and would recommend playing them again. III imo I prefer the original formula (NES, Pixel Remasters) over the 3D remake (DS, PSP, and PC).
With the boosters, I was able to finish the following
FF1 - 7 hours (compared to 20 on the PSP, GBA versions)
FF2 - 12 hours (compared to 20 on the PSP, GBA versions)
FF3 - 12 hours (compared to 20 hours on the NES version)
FF4 - 13 hours (compared to 20 hours on the SNES and PS1 versions and 25 hours on the GBA and PSP versions)
FF5 - 28 hours (compared to 25 hours on the SNES and PS1 versions and 60+ hours took me on GBA and Mobile remake on PC)
FF6 - 26 hours (compared to the 25 hours on SNES and PS1 versions and 55+ hours on GBA and Mobile remake on PC).
And I did also play FF7 OG on Switch as well with the boosters, took me 30 hours compared to 65 hours it took me without boosters on the Steam/PC version.
The boosters are the best QoL features in these games, they should implement them in every re-release of every game they make (including Dragon Quest lol).
