| JamesCantu said: First, you are conflating “murder†and “killing.†Both refer to the taking of life. But murder involves the killing of INNOCENT blood (e.g., abortion). That is always wrong, and God would never do that. |
Your God literally did that in the Bible.
Killing 70,000 people via a plague because David ordered a census on the people?
It's fucking murder.
Bashing babies against rocks? All babies are innocent.
It's fucking murder.
| JamesCantu said: Second, you are not making a distinction between “descriptive†and “prescriptive†language in the Bible. Descriptive language is merely describing accurately a historical event. |
So are you suggesting that the babies weren't bashed against rocks? That there was no slavery? That there wasn't child abuse? That Noahs flood didn't occur?
Because that is definitely not what the Bible describes.
This is the issue with apololgetics like you... You take the Bible in a LITERAL interpretation to fit your own narrative when it's convenient... Then you TWIST the interpretation to fit your own agenda when it's not convenient.
I am sorry to say, but there are 100's of millions of Bible bashers across the entire planet who would disagree with you and your specific interprtation of your cults texts.
| JamesCantu said: I don’t have the space to address all of your examples, but they are easily refuted. |
You have failed to refute anything.
| JamesCantu said: We are not anti-science; we are anti false scientific conclusions). Â |
If you disagree with Evolution, Abiogensis, Natural Selection, Big Bang, Climate Change and more... Then you are FACTUALLY anti-science.
| JamesCantu said: All I see when I look at your posts is your typical garden-variety angry, hateful atheist who is steeped in a life of sin. |
Your first mistake is thinking I care what you think.
Your second mistake is thinking sin is even relevant, sin is a religious invention... Nor is your cults book a good judgement for what can/can't be regarded as "good or bad" anyway considering it has literal babies being bashed against rocks.
Thirdly... I am far from angry, I am just making a mockery of your silly fallacies... And you don't even realize it.
But hey, if you dislike my rebuttals so much, why not pray for us to stop?
| JamesCantu said: when the concept of “morality†is something atheists have to steal from God in order to attempt to prove His non-existence! |
1) Atheists predate your God.
2) Atheists predate your entire religion.
3) Everyone is born Atheist, you included.
The fact you attack Atheists, then whinge when it's returned in kind, tells us you suffer from some narcissistic tendencies.
Also... We don't need to prove your God doesn't exist... We have already stupidly been over the burden of proof and why we aren't required to disprove it... It's actually YOUR job to prove your God exists, you made the claim.
You can't even disprove the flying spaghetti monster doesn't exist, so by your logic, do YOU think the flying spaghetti monster exists? It can't be disproven. Ever.
--::{PC Gaming Master Race}::--
