JEMC said:
Not to disagree with you, but AMD's success in the console business has more to do with 1) Being the only company that could provide both the CPU and GPU (Intel/IBM could do CPU but not GPU and Nvidia could provide GPU but not CPU), And when APUs came and gave them the option to have both on the same silicon, it only made the deal even better 2) Being easy to work with because they didn't act like d*cks (there's a reason neither MSoft after the first Xbox nor Sony after the PS3 wanted to work with Nvidia again) 3) They needed the money from consoles to keep the company afload, which was good both both sides |
Not sure where the disagreement is here. The last line of my post is "I think that has alot to do with their success in the console business."








