Interesting test, though a bit US-centric, and my results clearly reflect that.
Government:
I wasn't surprised at all by my high score in Apathy, as I've grown really wary of democracy and increasingly hopeless that it will ever work as intended. My answers on this scale were so idealistic that even I don't believe they're feasible or materially attainable. Hence, the result was Technocracy something that doesn't even exist (and I doubt it ever will)
Economy:
I've always seen myself as a social democrat, mostly. So when Mixed Markets got the highest score, it surprised me. That said, it makes sense, considering I chose the option for government-run services whenever possible. I've had mixed experiences with both state and private companies. sometimes they provide great services, sometimes they don't. That's why I believe their coexistence is what ensures fairer prices and better competition. I'd love to see more state-funded companies providing essential goods
Society:
No surprises here. Since I was a kid, I've had a strong disdain for meaningless conservative values that, to me, never made any sense. Maybe one day I'll be so jaded eldery and grumpy that I'll become the conservative guy myself but honestly, that day feels so far away it might never come
Religion:
No surprises here either. I'm becoming increasingly atheist by the day, but I have no desire to spend my time (or anyone else's) trying to make society atheist. Overall, I have mixed feelings toward religion and find them all rather pointless, but I get the appeal for people who are more... psychologically and emotionally inclined toward it. So I don't believe religion should cease to exist, at least not yet. What matters most is that religion should not be part of public life, let alone the state. If someone wants to practice religion, do it privately. So I politely ask you to stop coming to my house to preach to me
Security:
I didn't expect a specific scale for security, but given the number of questions about policing and the military, I guess it was inevitable. I think my score here suggests I'm a methodical person who believes in procedures and rules and that they are (or at least should be) above individuals. Of course, that doesn't mean those procedures and rules aren't often stupid (clue, they usually are) but alas that's a whole other problem...
Foreign Policy:
I'm surprised I even scored anything on the Nationalist side might've been a misclick, lol. Or maybe it was the question about preferring more educated immigrants. Overall, I think "nations" (as opposed to states) are an arbitrary concept. Mostly a leftover from a historical period when humanity didn't have the means for fast communication and travel. These cultural differences are now so ingrained they're nearly impossible to overcome unless some major catastrophe resets the global order. That said, I respect the concept of nations and understand their cultural value, even if they feel a bit outdated. As for Internationalism, I think being born and raised in a third-world country makes me more aware of and empathetic toward poorer nations especially the ones even poorer and more underdeveloped than mine. Providing aid and accepting refugees should be humanitarian priorities. For once, I'm glad Brazil has laws that are welcoming to foreigners and refugees.
