| javi741 said: All evidence points clearly towards the Switch 2 being more capable than PS4 Pro with or without DLSS. Switch 2 is running PS5 versions of games, which yes may not be end all be all, but when you combine it with the other things we've been seeing with Switch 2, it's clearly it's noticeable more capable than a PS4 Pro. PS4 Pro was never capable of 120fps and it was almost non-existent to see native 4k games run on it while for Switch 2 we have multiple games confirmed with 4k resolutions (Prime 4, Yakuza 0, ect..) and as you mentioned the Switch 2 already has a better CPU & RAM, which is already a huge part of the processing power of the system, and likely has a better GPU as well based on the leaks. It's pretty annoying that Digital Foundry is spreading their misinformed opinion around cause now people are going to believe the bad opinion that the Switch 2 is PS4 level when all evidence has pointed otherwise. It's especially bad that digital foundry is saying this cause they're the go to guys when it comes to the technical aspect side of games/consoles, when they say stuff like this people are gonna run away and believe it even though their opinion is wrong. They were also the same ones to say they didn't think the Switch 2 will be as powerful as a Steam Deck or PS4 which is clearly wrong based on everything we're seeing, neither of those consoles are powerful enough to support 120fps. Digital Foundry's opinion is just wrong. |
Yakuza 0 isn't running at 4K, it's running at 1080p with 4K cutscenes.
Besides, I don't think running a Switch-based game like MP4 at 1080p 120fps or 4K 60fps is the flex you believe it is. You're talking about a game that was already running at a solid 900p 60 fps on a GPU slower than a GeForce 920MX! (Huge props to Retro there, regardless.)
Doom 2016/The Witcher 3, for instance, have a comparable if not larger gap in rendering resolution + framerate between the PS4 and the Switch vs. MP4 between the Switch and the Switch 2.
