Is Switch 2's 256gb on par or worse than PS5's 825 launch model?

[Phenomajp13]

Leynos said:

RolStoppable said:

Switch 2 is better because it has actual physical games unlike the PS5 which forces everything to be copied to the SSD. As such, the amount of space that games take up measures in the MBs instead of the GBs.

As for third party ports? I am not going to pretend that people will be in a rush to buy the worst versions of multiplats.

This is false. PS5 has actual physical games. Most in fact have all the data on the disc. It's just a blu ray drive that can only read 100 or so MB a second. Too slow for todays games. So the install is to read the data at the SSD's speed at 5GB a second.

The post doesnt actually mean the PS5 doesnt have physical games. PS5 does require you to install the game to the console. Which means the console needs storage for the game ie the game can't be played via only the disc like a physical Switch/Switch 2 game (except the key card ones ofcourse, which has more in common with all PS5 physical games). Of course you probably knew this, so the point of your post is kind of weird.