Currently Online 
DroidKnight on 24 April 2025
| The_Liquid_Laser said: Any reason why you picked 172m, as opposed to say 171m or 173m? That number seems fairly precise. |
It's just where it landed after running it through some basic/lame equations. The initial number was higher but after calculating in uncertain economic conditions it brought it way down. Then it went back up for population increases. I'm not an analyst, nor a mathematician, so I wouldn't take the preciseness to mean anything. I basically just believe the Switch 2 has more going for it, than the Switch 1 initially had, and will surpass its sales.
...to avoid getting banned for inactivity, I may have to resort to comments that are of a lower overall quality and or beneath my moral standards.
