Otter said:
I just don't think Nintendo was in a situation where they needed this. They would need to have data to suggest that the cost point of the regular switch was a boundary to a notable amount of people, otherwise they can continue to sell the hybrid (maintain value perception) and reap the benefits of its being a hybrid (personal ownership=multiple per house, portable means more opportunity to play games = more spending on games, more cohesive branding). The truth is they will not sell a Switch TV for especially cheap even if they could because that undervalues the Switch brand as a whole. |
Companies make bone-headed moves all the time so I'm not going to assume that Nintendo have 100% accurate projections that show it wouldn't be advantageous.
If the S2 Home was $229 that'd be half the price...
The new demographic that you'd appeal to would be folk that are willing to spend $229 but not $450. Take any product and cut it's price in half & see what happens.
What Tesla model sells by far and away the most? Did the Model Y cheapen the Tesla brand or propel it to the most valuable car manufacturer on the planet? (I detest Elon btw). What GPU sells the most units? Which of Apple's laptops sell the most? Does the MBA cheapen Apple's brand?
Price is a massive differentiator.







