LegitHyperbole said:
Like I said above, this is frivolous spending when they aren't spending near enough of the profit they make on reinvesting in content. They could have made three really high quality 10 hour episode TV shows with this or many, many dozens of hours of B tier content. He'll, if they were smart with investing with talent and building their own quality stuff they could get dozens of hours of content people would lobe to watch, LOST the TV show had a budget of 4 million an episode, they could have gotten three 24 episode seasons of that for like 72 hours of viewing. Maybe a little less cause of inflation. All I'm saying is they either need to expand their spending massively and they can afford to by a triple or quadruple easily and still be profitable or they need to be smarter with the money. I for one can't support this shit anymore, we're giving them money to burn it chunks of it and hoard the rest and instead of being smart and good with money they just up the price. |
Why does it matter if it's a quality TV show or a movie? Good content is good content. If they want to invest $200m making a good movie I think that's well spent money? I'm not seeing the issue really.
What I really don't like about Netflix is the whole model of releasing too many stuff and seeing what sticks. But that's a winning formula for them that I don't think will ever change lol
