Darwinianevolution said:
I agree somewhat, but I do feel that this is more of a symptom of GameFreak resting in their laurels for many years rather than the actual quality of Legends AZ. Releasing more games faster while cutting corners, taking away features and mons and not even bothering with polishing S/V at launch, it's been happening since the Sun/Moon days. If there were less controversies and the quality of the games were higher and more consistent, nobody would complain about AZ's looks (the Pokemon community is shockingly lenient about that), but many fans have become more cynical about the series and the Pokemon Co.'s and Nintendo's direction for it. Considering they are becoming worse and worse and the sales keep going up, many are just jaded at the future, the series will be milked dry until something changes. |
I think if no one would would be complaining about AZ's looks, it's because there isn't really anything to complain about. I don't think GF's past issues are justification for nitpicking the looks of this one.
Maybe this is me, but I don't remember SM having polishing issues. Like I said, I think SV are the best Pokemon games since BW. I genuinely don't know what anyone is talking about when they say Pokemon is getting worse ever release when SV are the example of the worst ones. I feel like I'm in a dream world lol.
My critiques of the newer Pokemon is that they're designed worse in key ways every game, but that got better with SV for the most part. The towns are worse than they've ever been in some ways, and the post game is still as bad as it's been since BW, but it's all getting a lot better since LA. Gamefreak are improving a LOT, and ZA seems the same.







