By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
killer7 said:
curl-6 said:

Comparing MW2 to UC2 is a bit of an apples to oranges comparison really, as MW2 has to run at twice the framerate, leaving it just half as much processing time per frame, plus it had to run across 360, PS3, and PC, while UC2 had the luxury of being tailored to the hardware of a single platform and being 30fps.

Why apples and oranges? MW2 was never considered a graphical benchmark outside of the COD FB cosmos. Both where games released in 2009. Of course you can compare them. Its like saying we can't compare GOY to ACS because the former is exclusive. Fact is UC2 was a graphical benchmark that even made the PC fanbase extremly jalous!!😎

Never said you can't compare them, it's just not a like for like comparison for the reason I mentioned. UC2 was the best looking game on consoles at the time, but on PC Crysis from two years prior looked better.