US Politics |OT|

[Jimbo1337]

Torillian said:

Jimbo1337 said:

Cut the crap. State the legal code being broken. Failure to do so proves that you are just talking bullshit and in turn nullifies the first two sentences of your post.

The Impoundment Control Act of 1974

https://www.gao.gov/products/095406

And while this judge didn't state the legal code he was thinking of (from this article at least) he decided that the audit was not being done legally:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2025/02/07/trump-musk-government-efficiency-attorneys-general-lawsuit/

I'll let another user's post, that specifically responded to you, speak for itself: https://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9571094

This judge better have legal standing because knowingly concealing waste, fraud, and abuse is considered a violation under the False Claims Act (FCA). Concealment refers to actively hiding information, failing to disclose relevant details, or taking steps to obstruct investigations.

This is all under the predicate that the judge is knowingly doing this, and that waste, fraud, and abuse is occurring at the Treasury Department. I'll save this post and refer back to it after the legal proceedings.