Kurakasa said:
IF that post was meant to me, I have to tell you that I have no idea. Mostly because nintendo-gamers have very different idea of what is a "fantastic" title. Marketing? Do you really expect someone to remember which games were properly marketed many years ago? No, unless you are a diehard fan of some console. Vast majority of people who buys nintendo-games are familiar with the franchises, so they do know who published a game. ;) But I guess you have a valid point, since Mario&sonic has sold a lot. I bet a lot of people thought it was a nintendo game. And sorry to say this, but it is not really surprising that games like mysims and smartypants sell on wii. That is just the way wii's demographics go. |
Wow ... so much denial in your post.
Have you ever noticed that over 75% of movies that do well at the box office are based on another movie, comic-book, novel, television show, or video game? Or that the majority of the remaining titles have well known actors, directors, producers or (in the case of Animated movies) production companies?
Human beings favour entertainment products that they know over products that they don't know ... How many third party games released for the Wii were based on established IPs? Resident Evil 4, Resident Evil Umbrella Chronicles, Sonic and the Secret Rings, and MySims ... such awful performing titles.
Part of marketing a title is to know how to brand it so that the market would accept it; one way to effectively brand a product is to use an existing IP that people trust. People do not buy Mario games because they're made by Nintendo, people buy Mario games because after 2 decades they know that any game with Mario in it is good.







