By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
bdbdbd said:

I know the term woke existed long before, but it re-emerged in 2000's and the re-emerged context is how we talk about it today.

Yes, I repeated my point about Squid game as I wasn't sure If you ageed or disagreed with it. 

Leaving a religion leaves a void on your moral compass. Either it's some other religion or an ideology that fills it for most people. More specifically, I'm talking about how people act in masses, not certain individual's behaviour.

False.

People are frequently more moral, because they're not being misled.

bdbdbd said:

Even newborns have prejudices. Well technically they're just xenophobic. However, children's moral compass is narcissm. The parents need to teach their kids other moral values that aren't self centered. 

Obviously false. Babies become familiar with what is around them. They don't have any inherent context of what race they are. 

"Babies make a distinction between those who are more visually similar to people they are used to seeing and and those who are less similar.

A few studies have suggested that many babies develop a bias towards people apparently more like themselves over the first year of life. Newborns show no preference for faces from their own race as compared to another race and recognise all faces equally well. "

https://theconversation.com/how-young-children-can-develop-racial-biases-and-what-that-means-93150#:~:text=Babies%20make%20a%20distinction%20between,the%20first%20year%20of%20life.

bdbdbd said:

I'm actually quite curious on this one: If your country starts talking muslim immigrants, how long would it take for your atheist country to turn islamic? Why do you think what you think?

There's no single answer. It depends on how those people decide to promote policy.