By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
konnichiwa said:
Machiavellian said:

I think the most telling point is that you associate people who want to ban Harry Potter as woke.  Now why don't you tell us why you consider those groups as woke or would you put any group that wants to ban anything into that group, cancel a game because of whatever they feel is wrong with it or do you only include the groups you consider woke associated with the word.

That's why I wrote in my first post that woke is hard to define and used the part you quoted 'inclusive' behind 'woke'

That doesn't make woke hard to define, its that its used for everything.  There is no definition of woke outside of being "Something I do not like or agree with" because you can pretty much add everything gamers disagree with a game woke.  You only have to go to any number of forums including ones here and it all boils down to "I did not like this decision so its woke".

Basically you just painted a group as woke for wanting to ban Harry Potter but why are they considered woke for their opinion.  If anything, the need to label something we disagree with causes people to use to best avaliable term, no matter if it fits or not "Its close enough" which is generally what is happening.