konnichiwa said:
Just a few words it is getting late here: In don't know many of those bud light moments have to look it up but I know that in bud light' case Trump stated that he didn't support the boycott, the marketing team made a huge mistake and the person they used had some light left winged background. If Trump would advertise company A B or C in a commercial their will also be a ton of people who will not buy from that company anymore it also makes sense....  Bud light basically weaponized inclusivity and they failed and then supported the republicans. Moon girl Devil, I honestly don't know anything about except that it seems to be the case that Disney(or the production studio) deleted the episode themself before their were was any possibility of criticism from outside... I am an active booktok member and I hear the stories but can't say much about it because I always have been against the burning, cancelling of books. Bans on school is a bit different depends obviously on the content. Bans in library is wrong obviously, but more I can't say about it, each book that got banned in history has a big backstory that I need to read. |
Dylan Mulvaney is a transwoman. That was the entire Bud Light controversy. When people threaten "Bud Light moments" they mean death threats, boycotts, and occasionally physical violence as means to express their disdain for companies or groups supporting things like Pride Month or being a little too diverse for them.
The Moon Girl episode was leaked online and people have seen the whole thing now. I can't say that I agree with its message myself or with its characterization of everyone who finds there to be pertinent biological differences between trans and cisgender women that obviously matter in athletics as hate-driven prejudiced bigots, but I'm also against the company's decision to ban the episode. I don't have to agree with the content to support its right to exist.
I'm not much of a book banning kind of person either.