Leynos said:
This was proven to be a myth years ago as servers maintaining digital games and ESP in the era added NFTs they cause more green house gases. If games were still under 10GB and gaas had not taken over and no NFTs you'd be right but games reaching hundreds of GBs and now a large chunk of games being gaas. Some include MTX and NFTs that is far from the case anymore. Then account for how many watts a PS5 or Xbox generates or a 4090 now think what the 5090 swill be. |
I agree that NFTs are a big issue - and it's tied to the same technology that crypto-currency uses. But that's not true for the vast majority of software and digital items which require a trivial amount of energy. It's been brought up that on platforms like PS5, some games can get to 150+ GB, which might mean a lot of secondary storage if you have a lot of those. But again, that's a small matter compared to the vast majority of games out there. And NFT/high fidelity gaming is something I generally don't take part in. For the most part, digital games are significantly more green friendly as they limit manufacturing, shipment, packaging waste, in exchange for what amounts to trivial electrical expenditure when compared to actually running the software - physical or digital, it's all about reading data.
But on blockchain/tokens technology, I don't disagree.
I describe myself as a little dose of toxic masculinity.







