By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
LegitHyperbole said:
Zkuq said:

Still staying true to the name, I see.

It's why I choose it but in this case it's legit. I've done much deep dives into this iceberg and it's a rough one. It comes down to irratiated dust to make it simple and once all those cities end up irradiated in the atmosphere we are fucked.

There's enough information (+ disinformation and misinformation) in the world to support probably almost any viewpoint if that's what you want, and the chances are that you've come to an incorrect conclusion due to personal bias, mistakes, misunderstandings, incomplete information, or some other reason that's possibly hard to recognize. In general, things seem to have a tendency to turn out well one way or another, possibly through hardship, but the chances are that 'the end of the world as we know it' simply isn't true. Yes, there's worry and for good reasons too, but things will probably turn out OK. It's just not in the interests of anyone (capable of affecting the future significantly) to screw things up utterly.