Chrkeller said: Bad data like Trump being under polled in 2016 and 2020? Just because you don't like that data doesn't mean it is bad data. The data has it being tight, with an edge to Trump. You shouldn't backhand jab the messenger. And yes, professional betting firms aren't in the business of losing money and I'm certain they understand data better than the random folks in this thread. |
You've misread me on like every single point.
I gave no judgment on the actual data and I didn't give a backhand jab. (edit: I guess you were talking about the "actual data" bit. I wasn't quite talking about you.)
I pretty much just said bad data is misleading and good data can be misinterpreted, and mistakes can happen on industrial scales. Do you disagree with those statements?
Last edited by the-pi-guy - on 22 October 2024