| LegitHyperbole said: Checking put those new comparisons on the OP... this isn't making the PRO look good, this is making the base ps5 look like dog shit. What the actual fuck. You mean the enthusiast €800 + console is now what is necessary. Ffs. I'm set to buy a ps5 in less than a month but now.... what. You mean these games that don't look much better than on my Ps4 pro graphically look this blurry. What went wrong? Surely the ps5 hardware is more capable than that shit.... I'm actually stumped. What happened to checkerboard rendering that was producing so much better quality on PS4 pro but for the love of God if the developers can't optimise the game for the hardware why are they chasing graphics, bring the fidelity down to the point the console can handle it even if it doesn't look much better than 8th gen. Why fo I own a 4k TV if that's the image I'm getting, this was half sorted with the ps4 pro why is it such a step back.... |
Settle down my friend. The ps5 is a significant jump over the ps4. Those pics are zoomed in and there is no doubt Rebirth smokes Remake in terms of fidelity and size/scope. The ps5 is a very powerful system, you won't be disappointed.
Edit
Also Square uses their own game engines and they are hot garbage, so don't blame the hardware. FF16 runs like crap on a $1800 rtx 4090, as an example. At 4k + max settings the framerate drops into the 50s, which is absurd.
Edit
And I tend to agree with Pemalite, 16 gb is on the low side for total memory. One of the reasons I think people are expecting too much from the switch 2, 12 gb isn't what it used to be. Personally I wouldn't build a rig without 32 gb system ram and at least 16 gb dedicated vram. Even 16 gb vram I think will be low in a couple of years.
Last edited by Chrkeller - on 21 October 2024
