By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Conina said:

JRPGfan said:

^ this.

DF saying it performs abit below what a 4070 does (from their testing), but its the closest match on PC, GPU wise for it.
Then you just need to look at some place like Techpowerup, find a aggravated performance chart from a review, and see how much faster a 4090 is than say a 4070.

Then you do end up in the 90-100% range, depending on what model of 4090 you have (overclocked models will double a PS5 gpu performance) (going by DF).

You two were arguing if an RTX 4090 is 90% or 100% faster than a PS5 Pro.

And the problem with the TechPowerUp ranking... their test parcour is quite aged.

Older games like Doom Eternal, Metro Exodus, Control, Far Cry 6, the DX11-version of The Witcher 3...

Other sites with newer games in more demanding settings have a bigger gap than 100% between RTX 4070 and RTX 4090.

And if they adapt their test parcour once or twice a year, that gap widens further.

For example the UHD-results of 20 games at PC Games Hardware (PCGH).

September 2023 test parcour (20 rasterizing games): RTX 4090 was 109% faster than the RTX 4070.
Summer 2024 test parcour (20 newer rasterizing games): RTX 4090 was already 125% faster than the RTX 4070.

September 2023 test parcour (10 raytracing games): RTX 4090 was 122% faster than the RTX 4070.
Summer 2024 test parcour (10 newer raytracing games): RTX 4090 was already 129% faster than the RTX 4070.

I'm curious if the gap between RTX 4090 and RTX 4070 widens again in their 2025 test parcour with even newer and more demanding games. We'll see probably in a few months.

I don't disagree the 100% was an estimate value.  But an estimate isn't the same as a wild guess. 100% is a solid ballpark value.