By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
firebush03 on 09 October 2024
Edit Thread
zorg1000 said:
firebush03 said:

lol you can’t be serious. “only MSNBC seems to be worth watching” is literally the exact same as a Repub saying “only Fox seems worth watching”. The entire MSM is filled with liberals. They aren’t (seemingly) as harsh on Trump this election cycle b/c Trump is choosing to stay out of the spotlight. (Same thing Biden did in 2020.) Whenever Trump does come out, however, the media is quick to bite: An immediate example is the Harris-Trump debate with the fixation on his Springfield, OH comment.

“the much younger and more eloquent Harris” lol I love my politicians when they’re more eloquent. Yes, they are both old, but it’s not a double-standard: Biden is senile, Trump is not. The argument isn’t just Biden’s age, it’s his mental capacity. And libs can say all they want abt Trump’s mental capacity, he is leaps and bounds better than Biden was even in 2020.

It’s absolutely not the same, you can make an argument for MSNBC and other MSM having a liberal lean but it’s nowhere close to Fox which is right wing propaganda.

So does being harsh on Trump make a news organization liberal? Have you ever stopped to think why they are “harsher” on him than Harris? Could it possibly be because everything he says is a lie, stupid or hateful?

Reporting on the bullshit he says and does is not media bias, it’s them doing their job and I think there is an argument to be made that they actually go soft on Trump.

Trump’s mental capacity is absolutely trash, does he speak louder, clearer and more confidently than Biden? Yes. Do the things he says have any substance or coherency? Not usually. The guy is known for just ranting about any random bullshit that pops in his head and has the vocabulary and temperament of an 8 year old.

"So does being harsh on Trump make a news organization liberal?" Nope. What I'm saying is that MSM is overwhelming dem-leaning, but it's not b/c they're "hand on Trump". (Again, I have no stake in this election and I've already publically state here that Kamala is preferable solely for the repubs abhorant stance on abortion: I would love for more reporters to corner both these candidates with questions pertaining to Israel. :) Completely destroy both their campaigns, and maybe a good third-party option will arise next cycle.) My point here is that dems have no leg to stand on for complaining about how "unfair" the media has been toward Harris b/c they aren't crushing Trump this cycle. Do you disagree with this point? If not, then there was no point in you responding in the first place.

"Trump’s mental capacity is absolutely trash, does he speak louder, clearer and more confidently than Biden? Yes. Do the things he says have any substance or coherency? Not usually. The guy is known for just ranting about any random bullshit that pops in his head and has the vocabulary and temperament of an 8 year old." Trump and Biden are old, but one is senile, whereas the other has crazy talking points. Doesn't matter how fancy Trump is with his grammar or how based-in-reality his analysis is. If his message is able to be delivered and it is in a way which ignites his base, then he's doing his job right. Maybe in four years, you'll have some ground to stand on here, but for the present moment, Trump is still pretty much all there.