US Politics |OT|

[firebush03]

the-pi-guy said:

firebush03 said:

“I agree with him that such polls have little to no value.” What’s your evidence that Biden reaching a ceasefire agreement would cause more harm than good? Beyond just gut feeling.

”pressuring Israel into a ceasefire agreement would take nothing short of providing no aid to Israel anymore AND threatening them with sanctions. This wouldn't bode well for the American election.” What’s your evidence this wouldn’t bode well for the American election? Again, beyond just disputing the entirety of polling and relying solely on what your gut tells you?

@the-pi-guy You reading this, right? You have told me in the past “What would it take to convince you? If all evidence we provide isn’t sufficient, I don’t believe anything will be sufficient.” How would you respond to RolStoppable and Sundino13 in this instance? They are literally stating that you cannot trust polling b/c polling error exists lol.

I am not particularly taking a position, because I don't think there's particularly good data in this instance for either position. 

A.) what percentage of people would be supportive of US pushing these measures for ceasefire. What percentage of people are opposed to that?

B.) But more critically, for what percentage of people, would those decisions affect their election choices? 

A is relatively easy to figure out, I'm not sure there's good information on B. 

A ton of people support a ceasefire, but they would still vote for Kamala on the basis of women's rights, for example. 

You could be 100% right that Michigan is in jeopardy, or you might be completely wrong, because of other factors. 

(i was more asking for your stance on the fact that RolStoppable literally just said polls can't be trusted b/c i found a single poll refuting something he believes to be true. (i.e., I tagged you as a means to "clown" on him.))