By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
LegitHyperbole said:
Chrkeller said:

In defense of the port...  a ps4 is similar to a 7850 while the ps5 is close to a 6700xt..  that is 500-600% difference.  Porting just comes with massive sacrifices.  Personally, I would not take the sacrifices, but for those who are stuck a generation behind, let us be fair gaming is expensive, this is a better than nothing alternative. 

Just my 2 cents, I think this port represents what to expect of the S2 for third party, giant pass for me.  But others it is better than nothing.   

As one of the ones still left behind, I can't take these sacrifices and if I didn't know or was a casual on Xbox one I'd be disappointed especially on my 50 inch TV. Damn. I have a PRO so I get what, 900p or something but still really disappointing, I'd be able to play it but I'll wait for the PS5 version on deep sale and even then the PS5 quality mode has frame pacing and the performance mode has the worst FSR I've ever seen. Perhaps I'll skip this one entirely on second thought. 

I think the reality is game engines are outpacing GPUs, which is why I think people claiming "diminishing returns" are crazy.  Huge graphical jumps are there, but finding hardware to run these new game engines is terribly difficult.  There are a number of games that my 4090 can't even run maxed out.  RT is still in it's infancy as well.