curl-6 said:
IcaroRibeiro said:
The reason for a hardware to exist is to play games, whether or not they are available elsewhere doesn't really mean a thing. If the library is there, the console justified its existence. What is pointless is a console with small library, like a PS Vita or a Wii U
Wii U to Switch is the good example to prove there is a loophole in your logic. You spent 300 USD to get a console that was running Wii U games in Nintendo Switch cards, exactly what you just said would piss you off if you were a PS4 owners
The absolute majority of developers don't even have money to create games to take full advantage of PS5 specs anyway, namely almost every Japanese developerÂÂ
I guess according to console owners they should stop releasing their games on PS5, since their games are still using PS4 graphics
|
No, I spent $300 to play Mario Odyssey, Splatoon 2, and Xenoblade 2. If I could play those on my Wii U, then I wouldn't have bought my Switch.
|
The point is those games are just as new experiences as Zelda BOTW which is a cross gen game. A new game is a new experience, period. The fact they are released in two different consoles do not change that single fact
It's perfectly fine if you think you should not buy new consoles if the older console can play most of its games, it's your money after all. which doesn't make sense is to be unsatisfied and annoyed because developers decided they want more people (majority of them who can't afford buying consoles at launch) playing their games, oh the horror!
