Concord is Sony's biggest failure in gaming history.

[Zkuq]

Leynos said:

Zkuq said:

Since most of the pictures of that character I can find look different, I'm pretty sure that's an alternative skin, and in my limited experience, those can be more or less derpy. At a quick glance, the default skins actually seem fairly decent. I don't think you can attribute much of the game's to derpy skins such as the one posted above, since almost no one probably knows about them anyway.

Curl already posted some of the main designs. They are not decent. They are some of the worst since Battleborne. They range from bland to awful.  No one is dying to play a game with a fat dude in ski goggles dishwashing gloves and a 1980s women's winter coat. Alt or not they want people to give money for this.  Everything about the game is unappealing which is why it failed.

Most seem just fine to me, some even good. Some are not great for sure, to put it nicely, but that one particular skin got way more attention than it deserved. Discussion about the main skins would have been more fruitful, and maybe it was on, uh, page 6/10? Yeah, I'm not reading that many posts when I want to address one point. I can't really see most of the characters really being major draws, but probably not bad enough to warrant such low sales either. Perhaps great character designs could have made the game successful, but considering how badly the game's done sales-wise, I doubt such greatness was ever likely, and just a good level of character design would probably not have cut it. I think the game would probably have needed more draws than just more appealing character design, but yes, better character design would certainly have helped. That at least my impression of the situation.