| Robert_Downey_Jr. said: Burden of proof ain't on me when basic logic will tell you that screwing someone pretty clearly will make you look on the more favorably. |
The (very) obvious reason why no one defines burden of proof under "what's logical" is because what's logical to let's say a flat earther is not logical to the next person, and vice versa.
Likewise, some things that are logical to you are not logical to others.
Burden of proof is on the accuser of the unproven accusation.
Speaking of which, are you going to dodge demonstrating when I've previously been consistently dishonest, after you told me to "be honest for once"?
Or is this another thing that's just 'logical' to you, so burden of proof is actually on me to prove that I haven't consistently been dishonest?
