By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Chrkeller on 20 August 2024
Edit Thread
LegitHyperbole said:
Chrkeller said:

I have a 4090.  I would expect a 5090 to $1600 to $2000.  

The problem is RT is harsh even on a 4090.  Maybe RT will be the future, but IMO current hardware can't really handle it.  I keep RT off in many games, even with a 4090.  

According to DSOgaming a 4090 + max settings + 1440p + no RT runs at 60 fps....  good luck ps5.  This game is either poorly optimized or just a generation too early for current hardware.  

Hopefully the PRO systems focus on this. If you have a 4090 sure play it, cut a few setting in other places. Sure go 1080p if you need to, how's your CPU? I see it in the the your tag but don't know what ot means. Will you find issues with that? 

DF, had it running really decently on just a 4090 but they were mostly concerned about the CPU for things like the fog effects and what not and somewhat the RT high modes too. 

I built my PC last November, so I am still new to PC gaming and I am far from an expert, though I am learning.  The CPU is pretty high end, not as good as 3D AMD CPUs but still robust.  Intel has i3, i5, i7 and i9.  The i7 is higher end, and my understanding is the i9 don't help much with gaming but is more multi-tasking.    

If I were to grab it, based on reading a few articles I would probably go 1440p + max settings + no RT + Frame gen.  Looks like I would get 90-100 fps.  I find fps more important than RT.  120 fps is just amazing, everything is so much more accurate and responsive.