By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Robert_Downey_Jr. said:
Hiku said:

So Walz 24 years of service = depolrable?
Vance's 4 years of service + Trump's 0 years of service = amazing?

By the way, why name yourself after someone that hates everything you stand for?

The lying about going to war.  I love how you try to stay vague enough to not get the quality of his service.  The lies and dishonor to his fellow vets is what's deplorable.  Geez the dishonesty in not mentioning that is truly astonishing.  Be honest for once.

I hadn't even heard about him supposedly lying about going to war until now. I thought you may have been reffering to him retiring before being deployed to Iraq, but wasn't sure so I phrased it like a question for a reason.
Do you always make your own headcanon and just run with it?

And what do you mean by "be honest for once"? When was I dishonest? Let alone constantly. That's a big accusation to throw out, so I want you to explain this one.

After googling I'm guessing you're referring to when he said he carried an assault rifle in a war? In that case, he was officially deployed in a war for 9 months. But he wasn't stationed in a warzone, but rather in Italy.

That's likely what he was referring to. I wouldn't jump to the conclusion that he tried to lie about being involved in combat, considering he knows how easy it is to look up information about it.

After serving for 20 years, and qualifying for retirement, a medical board considered discharging him because of his hearing loss. But he convinced them to let him continue to serve. 24 years is a very long time to serve, considering the average lifespan of a person.

And Trump not serving for a single minute due to multiple deferments and "bone spurs" should be highlighted.
Comes off as very hypocritical of his campaign to attack a veteran over their service.

Last edited by Hiku - on 18 August 2024