By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Ryuu96 said:
Robert_Downey_Jr. said:

Omg they said weird that means I lost 😯

Also no, posts did not cause riots people are responsible for their own actions. In the same way posts did not cause BLM to burn down buildings and posts did not cause that guy to shoot trump. People are responsible for their own actions. Also a republican bias? That must be why kamala's posts still get hundreds of thousands of likes on X. Delusion in display

"When you demonize a guy this long and this intensely, making people falsely believe they will somehow lose their democracy if he wins, this is what happens." - You in response to the Trump assassination attempt.

Squarely on democrat shoulders and their media extremism. - You in response to the Trump assassination attempt.

If they'd apologize for their past rhetoric and say something like "If Obama had been shot in 2012 we would react much more harshly and go after republicans. We need to treat this with the same severity. We were wrong to say such extreme things." I'd gain some respect for them - You in response to the Trump assassination attempt.

Evidence that calling someone Nazi and threat to democracy would make people consider shooting him?  I can't provide evidence for thoughts I'm afraid.  Provide evidence it doesn't I guess. - You in response to the Trump assassination attempt.

They just need to take responsibility for their rhetoric. - You in response to the Trump assassination attempt.

They encourage more of that behavior every day trying to paint their enemies the way they do. - You in response to the Trump assassination attempt.

===

So which is it? Are people responsible for their own actions or did Democrats words apparently (lol) cause an assassination attempt on Trump? Or perhaps you're just regurgitating talking points without thinking for yourself, thus it would explain this sudden change in view to aid you in your new argument.

I'll make this simple for you though in regards to the UK.

  1. Fake news was spread that the murderer was a boat immigrant.
  2. People rioted against immigrants because they believed one was the killer.

Pretty damn safe assumption that there wouldn't have been riots if the fake news wasn't spread in the first place.

Just like there weren't riots for...

  • Lucy Letby, a British former neonatal nurse who murdered 7 infants and attempted the murder of 7 others.
  • Kyle Clifford, a man who killed a mother and her two daughters with a crossbow in July 2024.
  • Daniel Anjorin, a 14 year old boy killed in a sword attack in April 2024.

Exactly!  Which is it?  Was I right there or right here? It's not a safe assumption at all on your part.  It's a wild baseless assumption. Far more reasonable to say years of calling a particular person a Nazi would cause one person to go to violence than not liking an immigration policy causing multiple attacks on random people.  But you do you and continue to live in convenient delusion and bias to suit your narratives.



I am Iron Man