Shtinamin_ said:
Thanks for the questions. I hope your words were to actually learn and converse than to throw away and dismantle. (Positive energy than contention).
I might as well ask the same questions for Kamala. It is fair to see both sides. I’ll work on those questions for her as well. |
I started to reply but in truth, this could easily fill up its own thread. I was typing long rebuttals to everything but we really need a dedicated thread for discussing Trump.
I will state that you appear to view Trump from the viewpoint that he is just like any other regular ole father. That is an inaccurate lens to view with. I'll discuss more if we get a thread (or resurrect an old Trump thread). I appreciate you answering my questions and I feel I'm being unfair by not responding back to you in depth. And I'll answer the same Q's regarding Harris there.
sundin13 said:
Quick correction: Some of the polls use "likely voters", not all. If you head over to 538, you'll see they post "LV", "RV" or "A" next to the poll's sample size to indicate whether it was conducted with Adults, Registered Voters or Likely Voters. This is actually why 538's forecast is more left leaning than RCP's for example. The likely voter population in this cycle is expected to be more blue than the registered voter population, so they adjust for that. That also means that as we get closer to the election day and more polls switch from RV to LV, we are expected to see Kamala getting a small boost in polling numbers. You're right though that they don't just ask who is a likely-voter, they make a determination based on several questions they ask. Here are some example questions I found from Pew Research: • How much thought have you given to the coming presidential election? |
538 is just an aggregator of polls, just like RCP. Neither actually publishes their own in-house polls. You're are correct regarding the use of "LV", "RV" or "A" but if you drill down into what those mean, you'll better understand what I'm getting at. Specifically, these surveys are typically sent out to voter roles, that is known registered voters. This is far easier to obtain and allows the MoE to be listed as greatly reduced (known quantity vs unknown). And sure they use other lists too but they are often known quantity lists (sales lists, subscriber lists, cell phone number owner lists, credit card lists, etc...) but all of these are woefully lacking on properly surveying the young, new and disinterested voters.
To the privileged, equality feels like oppression.