By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Chrkeller said:
zorg1000 said:

So……you didn’t actually read what I said? Or are you intentionally ignoring my points? Or do you simply not understand them?

My argument has been pretty straight forward so I thought a millionaire scientist who previously told me I lack reading comprehension would have no problem understating it.

Seriously, which part of my post is so confusing to you? I have now twice said that the commission itself is not an issue and yet you continue to respond with “why are liberals afraid of data”.

You talk about compromise but this is a prime example of why that is so difficult, you are straight up ignoring every single point I’ve made and just repeating the same line as if it’s a “gotcha” moment.

I understand perfectly.  Too bad you don't.  

There was a reason it was voted down.  But hey, whatever floats your boat.  

Question. If you understood his post, then are you on the side of victim blaming? Do you expect politicians to stamp political support to a victim blaming study when it goes against their politics and the wishes of their constituents because? Do you not agree that a study toward the abusive police forces would be vastly more effective to find out why US police are abusive?

I’m not accusing you of anything, but if you understood the post, then you’d know that the sort of answer you give makes you sound like you’re in favour of blaming the victim than finding a solution to the problem.



I describe myself as a little dose of toxic masculinity.