| Ryuu96 said: First you said he registered as a Republican to vote against Trump, now he registered as a Republican to vote against Republican Senators, House Members, etc. Okay Dokey. Lol. I didn't zero in on the Presidential election, it was you, now you're adding more because I pointed out he registered as a Republican in 2021 so it was unlikely to be for President. How is there *strong* evidence that he wanted to vote against Republicans in 22/24 based on him donating $15 to a progressive campaign in 2021 and then later registering as a Republican...That ain't strong evidence. You accuse me of making up scenarios to fit the outcome I desire, that is exactly what you are doing here, over a $15 donation... The outcome I would desire is not even the outcome I've described, if I hate Trump (which I do) and hate the Republican Party (which I do) then the outcome I would say is that he is a Republican who has became jaded against Donald Trump for various reasons (shocking to you, those Republicans do exist, though are rare). Instead I say the outcome is likely to be yet another mass shooter in America, in a country with a severely lacking mental health support, with an incredibly easy access to deadly weapons, a man who was bullied his entire life, isolated and alone, tried to commit a horrific act and hit back at the world, where better to do that than a mass gathering like Trump's against a former President. How many mass shooters has America had now? How many young white males let down by the system have gone on to commit disgusting acts now? The facts are he donated to Progressives in 2021 and Registered as a Republican after, that his shirt was for a pro-gun/right leaning YouTube channel, that he was a loner who was bullied in High School, that he didn't express any political stance to his friends or any criticism of Trump, nor did he do so on Discord. Those are the facts and everything else is theory and I find my theory holds more water than yours with the facts that we have. Your "He registered as a Republican to vote against Democrats" is NOT fact. I'm not actually desperately trying to pin my theory to blame Republicans as you're desperately trying to invent a theory to blame Democrats. I'm simply saying he is likely yet another fucked up dude who wanted to kill people as America has so many of them, there's absolutely no hard evidence so far that he was politically motivated on either side. SO FAR. |
Please provide your vgchartz post where you explicitly mentioned that this shooter donated to the Progressive Turnout Project. I searched through your previous posts and couldn't find it. I'm asking for this because I want the facts to be laid out for all to see.
Voting against Republican Senators and Republican House of Representatives is a vote against Trump and the Trump MAGA movement. It would be intellectually dishonest to suggest that the Republicans running today don't support this MAGA movement.
It is strong evidence because he donated to PTP FOURTEEN DAYS after January 6th. I would also like to point out that in your entire post, you failed to mention this fact. Yet again you are intentionally leaving out facts in order to create your own narrative. You then go on to say that I am basing my narrative over a $15 dollar donation. I would like to point out the fact that Bernie Sander's average donation was $27. Are you suggesting that those donations to Bernie Sanders are not indicators of his supporters?
Your entire scenario is based on this being a mass shooting.
"Mass shooting, as defined by the U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), an event in which one or more individuals are “actively engaged in killing or attempting to kill people in a populated area. Implicit in this definition is the shooter’s use of a firearm.” The FBI has not set a minimum number of casualties to qualify an event as a mass shooting, but U.S. statute (the Investigative Assistance for Violent Crimes Act of 2012) defines a “mass killing” as “3 or more killings in a single incident.” Source: https://www.britannica.com/topic/mass-shooting
The entire news media is labeling this event as an assassination on a former president. That's a fact. Assassination is not the same as a mass shooting. This was targeted towards one individual. All shots that were fired had the intent of killing former President Trump. Rounds that killed or injured innocent bystanders was not his intended target based on the facts.
Words matter. Stop trying to tie this to previous mass shooting events when the definition doesn't fit the scenario. Those previous mass shooting events didn't have a political motive. I would say that trying to assassinate a former president who is a "danger to democracy" is politically motivated.
Other users do not agree with you. The more I point out your fallacies the more it is apparent that your made up scenario falls apart.
Last edited by Jimbo1337 - on 14 July 2024
