Ryuu96 said:
The 6 month freeze is part of the law too, to prevent them from laying off a contractor before 18 months but then just rehiring them a month later for another 18 months, 6 month freeze ensures Microsoft can't abuse it because nobody will keep a position empty for 6 months. It's all Microsoft's fault from back in the day abusing contractors. The only way around it for Microsoft would be to actually suck it up and hire more fulltime employees but that'd cost more money which the poor trillion dollar company can't afford, not sure if they do it outside of America though, I know The Coalition doesn't accept contractors full-stop. The other way around it would be more co-development partnerships. It's because Microsoft didn't want to give contractors full-employee benefits, maybe it's not an issue outside of America. |
This was not just MS that did this. Just about every company at the time hired contractors so that they did not have to pay out benefits it was pretty much standard during that time. MS was just the biggest company taking advantage of it but it changed the industry as a whole. After that, contract agencies had to start to pay for benefits for their employees since they were technically really employed by them. In the tech industry and for companies that use contractors, experience is the key and thus you always get jobs because if you are highly experienced you are highly sought, not to mention you get paid more than if you were working at the company full time. I made my best money during this span.