MikeB said:
The PS3 is the PS2 sucessor, however it's not designed to do PS2 or Wii-like sales right out of the gate. That would be far too expensive for Sony. we discussed thi earlier, it's not true. Sony wouldn't spend over 3 billion if they didn't think it would be a massive success. I didn't notice huge bumps in 360 hardware when GTA4 and DMC4 were released and I don't expect this from the new Resident Evil neither if released simultaneously with the PS3 version. I think the situation will become much clearer when a slimline PS3 is launched (which will be designed to do PS2 like sales) and a few months after all major XBox games have received 360 sequels (Fable and Star Wars). I think 2009 will be an even more crucial year with regard to the "console wars". The PS3 outsold the 360 in 2007, for 2008 the gap will likely be much bigger, for 2009 I expect the gap to be enormous. |
No, but there wasn't a big bump for PS3 either. With GTA as PS3 exclusive that bump would have been pretty significant for PS3, plus would have prevented a lot of 360 sales, therefore increasing the differences from two sides. It was never Microsofts main plan to win the console war, actually one of their most important ideas behind Xbox was to keep Sony from domination. Even if PS3 will beat 360 (what will probably happen) Microsoft is at this moment more successful than Sony in the console business. MS has a profitable entertainment division, Sony has lots of problems with SCE.
Most importantly for Microsoft: it's next console can benefit a lot from the gains it has made with 360 in regard to 3rd party games. Most publishers are very happy to heve their game on Microsofts platform, which will be important in their next generation console.