JEMC said:
Zkuq said:
My opinion wasn't asked for and I'm bad at Civ, but based on my experience (IV, V, and VI), I'd go with V first. IV is a bit ugly and the doom stacks are ridiculous, but otherwise it's a very good game (or at least I thought so when I played it as my first Civ game a looong time ago). V is more modern and overall a very good game but definitely not perfect either (I think AI was cited as a problem, especially with the limit of one unit per hex?). I believe III has a good reputation as well, Beyond Earth not so much. I'm sure JEMC will be able to provide a much deeper opinion about the games with his experience, but that's my two cents based on my limited experience (just three games with at most 100 hours each). |
You have too high an opinion of me. You're a fan of stacked units? I don't think I could have dealt with it. |
Well you've played 300 hours of just one Civ game, which might be more than all my Civ experience combined. 
I'm... not a fan of stacked units, that's why I called them ridiculous. Limited stacks are probably fine, but stacking all you want in one tile? Nope, nope, nope. I mean it's not terrible, but it's definitely not great either. I'd take one unit per hex/tile any day, even with all the AI trouble it brings with it (based on my limited experience, again - if I had hundreds if not thousands of hours in any one Civ game, perhaps I might think otherwise).
