By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Soundwave said:
HoloDust said:

I don't think they need to go for 4K per eye - Vision Pro is not 4k by the way, it's 3660x3200 per eye, 34PPD. With resolving power that is actually worse than Quest 3.

I think something like Pimax Crystal Lite should be their "sensible" solution for Quest 4, 2880x2880, with 35PPD.

They should go as high as they can IMO, the pixels do matter, I notice when watch big screen movies on the Quest 3 there's still a pixelated effect that leaves a bit to be desired, I've heard on the Vision Pro watching movies in 4K is mind blowing, if Quest can get there but offer something like that for a much lower price I think that would be a really nice killer feature they could tout. 

They need to improve the software too, the Netflix and Youtube apps are outdated and there should be a native Disney Plus app. 

Yeah, Quest 3 is bit of a let down on many fronts, resolution being one as well, though it does have better resolving power than even 7x pricier Vision Pro (which isn't really even that good compared to some other high end VR headsets) - not that it matter much with resolution it packs.

Price is the point - Quest 2 succeeded because it was best bang for the money, while still being technically quite solid - they cannot go all out with tech, cause that would make next Quest way too expensive. There is reason why I mentioned Pimax Crystal Lite, since it's $699, so it's reasonable to assume that Meta can use similar screen for less cost - you want something much better, with 50+ PPD and 3840x3840 per eye, sure there's that too - but for $1800-$2000.