curl-6 said:
The ones that didn't make it don't change the fact that hundreds did. There simply wouldn't be so many Switch ports if it wasn't viable, period. |
Now it seems you are missing the point.
In my original post I said games that get ported to Switch tend to be the ones that are guaranteed to be profitable/viable.
You countered by saying Switch ports aren't expensive or risky.
I responded by saying if they aren't expensive or risky, then the 3rd party support would be booming like Sony or PC.
And then our recent posts.
You get what I am saying now? I didn't say all the ports weren't viable, just that devs pick and choose the ones more guaranteed.
But I still disagree that isn't expensive or risky for all the other games that weren't ported.
