By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
jalsonmi on 07 July 2008
Edit Thread
sc94597 said:
jalsonmi said:
tehsage said:
sc94597 said:
No, because the PS was a console that was suppose to make gaming mainstream, and here is the thing you guys aren't going to beleive "CASUAL" yep, that is right. The PS was the first casual console. So I don't think 3rd parties would matter. they sure haven't in the Wii's case.

 

Wasn't the NES the first casual console?

 


Wasn't the Atari 2600 the first casual console?

When I said casual, I meant casual based. I don't really see any consoles that are as casual based as the consoles winning consoles after the PS.

 

 


What's the difference between a casual console and a casual based console? I'm asking sincerely--I'm not sure what you mean is all.  Also, I don't know what your second sectence means.



My consoles and the fates they suffered:

Atari 7800 (Sold), Intellivision (Thrown out), Gameboy (Lost), Super Nintendo (Stolen), Super Nintendo (2nd copy) (Thrown out by mother), Nintendo 64 (Still own), Super Nintendo (3rd copy) (Still own), Wii (Sold)

A more detailed history appears on my profile.