A203D said:
" I've read enough of the replies back and forth that I really don't want to engage in what seems to be discussions slipping more and more off topic. Have a good one." You've engaged me to try and prove yourself the moderator who lost a lot of ground to me. I'm not sorry that hasn't worked out for you, but you chose this path, not me. Let me remind me of what you said: "I only ask since you keep referring people to Vice" I gave multiple links, but you ignored them, including the part where the United Nations did not sanction an invasion of Iraq because you were trying so hard to impress the moderators. You saw that guy lost so much ground you went into support his chemical weapons post, in which you then ignored the article I posted. You then tried to propose a conspiracy theory that Iraq was hiding weapons of mass destruction: "If you tell me exactly where and when you are going to look for something, chances are I am going to be able to hide it from you." This is what you said, then you ignored the article I posted about chemical weapons: "Participants in the chemical weapons discoveries said the United States suppressed knowledge of finds for multiple reasons, including that the government bristled at further acknowledgment it had been wrong. “They needed something to say that after Sept. 11 Saddam used chemical rounds,” Mr. Lampier said. “And all of this was from the pre-1991 era.” You should read the whole article, its quite insightful. Either way, an invasion of Iraq was not sanctioned and US actions were illegal. "Don't bother responding I was initially trying to help you out by trying to remedy what i thought may be a misinterpretation of your use of "covid hoax" but you didn't bother to answer that." Well the moderator felt threatend so he played the warning card so I couldn't talk about it, which you already knew, hence why you have coming running to his defence when you saw he lost so much ground. Is it my fault you chose to reply to a comment that you were never involved with in the first place? |
You got it wrong. All that happened here is that a conservative distanced himself from someone on the far-right.
Legend11 correctly predicted that GTA IV will outsell Super Smash Bros. Brawl. I was wrong.
