Fight-the-Streets said:
What is funny is that in the table, Wikipedia has it at 160.2m (as of March 31, 2013). I think it's a typo, otherwise there's no clue from where they have the addtional 200k. |
Seems there's a bit of a war going on at Wikipedia over this, with back and forth unregistered edits to the 160 number and then those being reverted back towards the last official 155 number by others.







