By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
curl-6 said:
Chrkeller said:

And I staunchly think developers should cut the fluff before going after graphics.  I'm playing zero dawn and it has a ton of irrelevant collectibles.  The side quests in FF7 Remake are boring and irrelevant.  Developers need to stop trying to make every game 40+ hours.  RE remakes sold just fine at 10 to 20 hours.  

As for Hogwarts, the game grossed over a billion and cost 150 million....  I have no idea what WB is complaining about.  

And of course drop exclusives.  Support PC day 1.  

That too, this obsession with making everything a 50+ hour extravaganza is needless and stupid.

There's a place for games with amazing graphics, and for huge long games, but not every major game needs to be both. Publishers have nobody but themselves to blame for overspending on every damn game then crying when they don't make enough profit.

Look at Nintendo, most of their games can be beaten in under 10 hours, and none of them have AAA production value, yet they sell tens of millions.

Even Nintendo struggles to sell millions of copies of a game that doesn't have one of their 5-6 main IP properties attached to it (Mario, Pokemon, Zelda, Animal Crossing, etc.). Pikmin after like two decades has finally built upon enough of an audience to maybe sell 4 million WW? 

Most studios have 0 IP like Nintendo's top IP. 

Saying "just do what Nintendo does" isn't going to work for a lot of publishers. It's like saying "just play basketball like Michael Jordan", that's a lot easier said than done.