Soundwave said:
I said it's advocates think it will be glorious, if you count yourself as one of those, then so be it. I'm just saying that if we're talking in the long term will get ugly, and the worse case scenario is about as bad as it gets (destruction of human civilization). As it relates even to gaming, I don't think it's going to be the great thing people think it will be. These companies will not spend billions/trillions of dollars on AI tools just for "video game developers", there's not enough money in that. If they have tools like that they will open it up to the mass public, which will likely then lead to rampant theft of other people's existing work and having a bunch of "content creator" wannabes flooding the market with so much content the industry will just collapse. There will be thousands of bootleg versions of popular games that look just as good as the real thing and some of them probably play pretty well even. The whole "content" industry -- talking movies, games, music is going to radically change to look like something more like Tiktok, Youtube where anyone can have what effectively their own broadcast station to the world. In a world where anyone can make anything however they want, the value of that content becomes nothing. That's why I won't support any move from game creators to replace humans with AI to design games themselves. AI upscaling is one thing, that's a whole other can of worms. It won't lead to anything good. |
Lol, for a better part of a year you have been loving on DLSS and frame gen. Both will make ports easier because instead of people the AI handles the port..... but now you won't support AI.
The simple explanation is you had zero idea DLSS and frame gen were AI developer tools and now have dug a hole.
DLSS..... deep LEARNING super sampling. Instead of people optimizing and developing extra pixels, AI calculates the pixels.... 😆
Last edited by Chrkeller - on 05 March 2024|
i7-13700k |
|
Vengeance 32 gb |
|
RTX 4090 Ventus 3x E OC |
Switch OLED







